Mongol rule had the great consequence of separating Russia from Western Europe. Then, it contributed significantly to the cruelty and harshness of folk customs and administrative practices. Much Orientalism entered the Russian life through the Moscow. Moscow has lent, perhaps, some useful lines in the organization of government, finances, statistics, but this positive profit is quite lost when compared to the enormous evil that undoubtedly brought evil times.
Explanation:
- Mongol rule undoubtedly completely torn the state and national unity of the Russians, insofar as it was, although it did not completely suppress the national consciousness.
- The western and southwestern Russian provinces were not long under the influence of the Tatars, but came under the influence and power of Poland, Lithuania and some Germans.
- Northwest Russia, like northern Russia, was more nominally under Tatar rule, while the middle of the country remained under the yoke for the longest and longest.
Learn more on Mongols on
brainly.com/question/1600671
brainly.com/question/1560379
#learnwithBrainly
False, it was fought between France and England. Charles IV of France died without a son to take his place, so Edward III of England thought he had the right to Frances throne through his mother
Basically North African and Middle Eastern cultures have very similar traditional clothing styles, food, architecture, beliefs and art.
This is caused by two main factors: common environment and common rulers.
Both North Africa and the Middle East are hot, dry and deserty. Dominated by the Arabian-Syrian/Sahara Deserts, both cultures were greatly influenced by their harsh environment that necessitated certain adaptions (most notably clothing and certain foods, pork for example generally rots easily in the desert and becomes dangerous to eat).
There is also the issue of their common religion/rulers. A large portion of their joint history has been spent serving under one ruler or another (Rome, Abbassids, Ottomans, etc.) They also share a common religion, greatly influencing eachother.
They saw plessy v Ferguson as that the were "separate but equal" meaning that all races were given the same opportunities but were segregated.
Let me know if this is right/ helps!
Answer:
Farmers produced enough food to allow others to take on other jobs
Explanation:
People natural instincts were to survive. When they didn't have to worry about this because they had an abundance of food they used their skills for other things.
