Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
The protection of the environment is our moral responsibility for the continuation of life on earth. In other words, they are the human values that are valuable to a person that dictate their actions towards the environment. Human beings use this logic to make decisions on whether something is wrong or right.
Explanation:
Answer:
Undoubtedly, every Government's foremost duty is to protect human rights. The Government has all the power and infrastructure such as the constitution, the judiciary, the police, etc. to do this.
The wealth of these city-states were flourishing, and it is visible because of the infrastructure being built. Note that better infrastructure is an opportunity for better trade. Trade = wealth.
