The theory which supports Kevin's view is known as liberalism or neoliberalism, and defends individual freedom, the fight for the own interest and economies which are independent of the interventions of governments. This in turn, would bring the best possible outcome for the colective as public spending and state intervention distort markets, which allocate resources and income more efficiently on their own.
Connecting (neo)liberalism with Kevin's views, people who cannot pay their higher education would not be able to study, as he supports the idea that public spending thorugh scholarships or cheap loans should not be granted to people without means to pay their studies . In turn, they should find their own way within the markets system, for example, find a job and earn the money, obtain a private loan and return the money afterwards, etc.
The appeasement made his hopes for imperialism stronger. This made the war possible.
Explanation:
The appeasement policies on Germany by the Allied powers meant that they were in the middle of an expansion spree and Hitler's popularity had soared because of it.
As the other nations did not do much to prevent it the Germans were hoping they would not care when the invade other nations too.
This became the root of the conflict as when the nations retaliated Germany locked down and started the war against them for which it had prepared more than the others,
Ancient Athens. it was direct democracy where the people were allowed to decide on policies directly.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
During the Ming and qing dynasty the Chinese government never encouraged technological innovation as a foundation of economic strength because of their ruling ideology they were unwilling to take any institution nor principles behind government in their idea of reform and as a result China never develop its own capability of technological reform which could have failed because of conservative forces ingrained in their culture
Answer:
- Differences consisted of military intimidation and calm integration.
- The Assyrians would smash dams, set fire on crops, cut down trees, and skin the rebels
- The persians would do calm integration to unify empire and prevent revolts.
- Unlike persians, Assyrians chief god was Ashur.
- contrary to Persians, Assyrians were heavily influenced by its mesopotamian predecessors.
Explanation:
The Assyrians were the nazis of the ancient world. They were so brutal and cruel that cities and entire countries would surrender to their army just on the news that they might attack.
The persians were completely opposite of it under the rule of Cyrus. They were unforgiving to those who opposed and betrayed them, but Cyrus set an example of kindness and Mercy. He allowed them to maintain their respective faiths and religions and allowed them freedom as long as they were industrious and peaceful and paid tribute to the Persians on schedule.
