Answer:
Pics Match is the only business sensitive affected by network effect
Explanation:
Moonglow Shoes: The sales are based on answers collected before the launch of the product, and the sales are based on the reputation of the Olympic medalist. The number of users does not change the value of Moonglow Shoes. Clover Technologies: Since the company is B2B (Business to Business), the increasing of final users does not increase the value of the products sold by Clover Technologies. Pics Match: The relevance of the business is based on how much users are enthusiastic about the social network and promote it to other users. The value proposition of Pics Match increases according to the number of users. Green Tools: The increase of users does not increase the subjacent value of products sold by Green Tools, even though the sales channel is internet
The driver was going 55 mph.
Two hours is not enough to change the first digit of 15951, therefore, 1 is the first and last digit of the new number. The fourth and second digits converted to 6 and the middle digit could either by 0, 1, 2, 3, …,9. Therefore, the driven miles will be 110, 210, 310, … respectively.
So in two hours, the car would have sped up at 55 mph, 105 mph, 155 mph, … respectively.
Answer and Explanation:
The answer is attached below
Answer:
$21.44
Explanation:
Calculation for the cost per equivalent unit for materials for the month in the first processing department
First step
Units completed and transferred out $7,500
Ending inventory($800+$8,400-$7,500)*70% Ending inventory =1,700*70%
Ending inventory =$1,190
Equivalent units for Materials $8,690
($7,500+$1,190)
Total materials costs $186,300
Second step
Cost per equivalent unit for materials=Total materials costs÷ Equivalent units for Materials
Cost per Equivalent unit for Materials $186,300÷$8,690
Cost per Equivalent unit for Materials=$21.44
Therefore the cost per equivalent unit for materials for the month in the first processing department is closest to $21.44
Answer:
Annual cashflow for the decision= $162 million
Explanation:
The proper cashflow would be determined as follows:
Contribution per unit = Sales price - variable cost
Contribution per unit of new chip = 25-8 = $17 per unit
Contribution per unit of old chip = 20 - 6 = 14 per unit.
<em>Contribution form the sale of the new chip = contribution per unit × annual sales in unit</em>
=17 × 12 million units = $204 million
<em>lost Contribution from the old chip = contribution per unit × lost annual sales in unit</em>
Lost contribution from old chip= $14 × 3 million unit = $42 million
Note that the lost contribution is an opportunity cost occasioned as a result of the introducing the new chip, hence the contribution should be deducted
Annual cashflow for the decision= $204 million -$42 million = $162 million
Annual cashflow for the decision= $162 million