Increase your following distance to around 5-6 seconds
Make sure your high beams are on
The given statement “It is well understood and specified that the privileges prolonged under the Habeas corpus writ is not suspended until unless there is a case of rebel” is true.
Answer: Option 1
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The case where there is rebel or in case of invasion, the suspension is achieved for the Habeas corpus writ. This is in accordance to the suspension clause of the constitution with the section of 9 in clause second under the Article 1.
The rebel or invasion is for the requirement of public safety as in regard. If in the case raised, then the President, only one who had the power to suspend it as per the constitution.
I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
Yes he will win, the employer is at fault
