1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pickupchik [31]
3 years ago
9

Unlike a grand jury, a petit jury

Law
1 answer:
sveticcg [70]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Its that already the whole question?

I dont understand it srry :(

You might be interested in
Which of the 8 features of a civilization makes our *CURRENT* civilization more advanced and successful?
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

8 Features of Civilization.

Cities.

Organized Government.

Job Specialization.

Public Works.

Established Religion.

Social Classes.

Art and Architectur

4 0
3 years ago
In the case of the U.S. Supreme Court cases ruled that requiring sentencing
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

D.) United States v. Booker

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The three main sources of international law are treaty, custom, and
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

General principles of international law

4 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
The 5th Amendment had an impact on Miranda V. Arizona.<br> O True<br> O False
SashulF [63]

Answer:

true, i think

Explanation:

In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not a right a right to protected by the constitution and/or bill of fights?
    6·1 answer
  • Match the vocab with the right definition. SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Due process protections under the 5th Amendment include all of the following except:
    8·1 answer
  • Due right NOW Pleasee IM BEGGING YOU
    15·2 answers
  • “Classical theory” is one of the earliest criminological theories, and argues that people choose to commit a crime out of their
    13·1 answer
  • A couple alter the number on a lottery ticket to match the previous night's winning
    12·1 answer
  • Facts about the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
    14·1 answer
  • Which form of damages involves a court ordering a party to a contract to perform his/her obligations under the contract
    12·1 answer
  • EASY//
    7·1 answer
  • How does the media expose human rights violation​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!