Answer: if animal testing continues then all the animals will be either almost extinct or there will be animals that are dangerous and not safe for the environment
Explanation: that's just what i would say
Answer: It’s specific to a single artistic work and doesn’t overlap with other similar works.
Answer:
I think it's C. Luisa loved riding horses, but she was afraid of the foxes that sometimes jumped out of the trees and scared her horse.
Explanation:
The word ridding in the original sentence means to get rid of, to free something. But the word riding means to ride something, in this situation it's Luisa riding horses.
I hope this helped. :)
This can fit into the category of Hasty Generalization, this is, that you generalize with a lack of evidence or better,reasons as of to state that the trilogy of the Lord of The Rings isgood. It is good because it is good, if the first part is good, then all the trilogy is good.
Another option might be a fallacy called <em>ad populum </em> which takes place whenever you appeal to the public knowledge of something to prove it is true. In this case forexample, you could say: the reviews are giving this movie 5 stars, so this movie is good, because people like it.
