Answer:
1- Walmart wanted global expansion and it availed the opportunity to expand its business by entering Indian market, however the Indian market is far different than the US market that is why a joint-venture was required to enter the different market as Bharti Enterprises was already operating in Indian market.
2- To enter a new market Joint-venture will be suitable because:
In acquisition the investor acquires all the shares of an existing organisation in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost. In a Joint venture the investor and a local investor invests together to form a different organisation, in this method the organisations jointly own a newly formed organisation in which they both jointly decide the name and the local investor have knowledge about the local market which can be helpful if the customer taste is different than the investors market. In a Greenfield investment the investor purchases shares and bonds of an organisation already operating in the targeted market, in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost.
Explanation:
1- Walmart wanted global expansion and it availed the opportunity to expand its business by entering Indian market, however the Indian market is far different than the US market that is why a joint-venture was required to enter the different market as Bharti Enterprises was already operating in Indian market.
2- To enter a new market Joint-venture will be suitable because:
In acquisition the investor acquires all the shares of an existing organisation in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost. In a Joint venture the investor and a local investor invests together to form a different organisation, in this method the organisations jointly own a newly formed organisation in which they both jointly decide the name and the local investor have knowledge about the local market which can be helpful if the customer taste is different than the investors market. In a Greenfield investment the investor purchases shares and bonds of an organisation already operating in the targeted market, in this way the investor will not be able to operate with the same name as in other markets as the organisation whose shares are purchased already will have a name which if changed all the goodwill will be lost.
Are there any answer options? I know the answer if you have options
Answer:
B$10,800 debit balance.
Explanation:
In the given question, first we have to compute the difference of cash account which equals to
= Total debit entries - Total credit entries
= $4,800 - $4,000
= $800 debit
Now add this amount to the beginning balance which equals to
= Beginning amount of cash balance + Difference amount
= $10,000 + $800
= $10,800 debit
A tax cut that will last for only a year will not have a huge effect on the aggregate demand as the aggregate demand increases only when the tax cut is permanent.
The given statement is false.
<h3>What is a tax?</h3>
A tax is a liability imposed on the taxpayer to pay a specified sum to the government based on the income they have earned in the previous year.
When the cutting of taxes becomes permanent in the country, then the citizens can start to acquire more which will increase the spending. The families will expect that the tax cuts are for the longer term which now induces them to buy and spend more and also act as an addition to their incomes. This whole impact would eventually lead to rising in aggregate demand.
Therefore, the demand increases when the tax cuts are permanent rather than when tax cuts are for only one year.
Learn more about the tax cut policies in the related link:
brainly.com/question/13924294
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. How long will the current bridge system work before a new bracing system is required?: 64.18 years or 64 years and 2 months.
b. What if the annual traffic rate increases at 8 % annually: The bracing system will last for 24.65 years or 24 years and 7 months.
c. At what traffic increase rate will the current system last only 12 years: 17.13%
Explanation:
a. Denote x is the time taken for the number of pedestrian to grow from 300 to 2000. The current pedestrian is 300, the grow rate per year is 3% or 1.03 times a year. Thus, to reach 2,000, we have the equation: 300 x 1.03^x = 2000. Show the equate, we have 1.03^x = 6.67 <=> x = 64.18
b. Denote x is the time taken for the number of pedestrian to grow from 300 to 2000. The current pedestrian is 300, the grow rate per year is 8% or 1.08 times a year. Thus, to reach 2,000, we have the equation: 300 x 1.08^x = 2000. Show the equate, we have 1.08^x = 6.67 <=> x = 24.65.
c. Denote x as traffic increase rate. The current pedestrian is 300, the grow rate per year is (1+x) times a year. Thus, to reach 2,000 after 12 years and thus a new bracing system to be in place, we have the equation: 300 x (1+x)^12 = 2000. Show the equate, we have (1+x)^12 = 6.67 <=> 1+x = 1.1713 <=> x = 17.13%.
