The Kansas-Nebraska act allowed the people to vote if wanted to allow slavery in those states and this act served to appeal the Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery in the north. This act was also said to be a failure because it was made to end the conflict over slavery, but resulted in Kansas becoming a "battleground over slavery."
Answer:
The Kansas-Nebraska Law was passed in 1854. This law had the objective of creating two new states, Kansas and Nebraska, which would define their acceptance or not of slavery through popular sovereignty, in which the people would vote by accepting it or not. This situation clearly violated what was established in the Missouri Compromise, since both territories were north of the 36º 30 'parallel, established by said commitment as the limit between the slave states and the free states.
This situation, which protected the possibility of popularly deciding on slavery, intensified the conflict between slavers and abolitionists, since both groups were allowed to take a direct part in the establishment or not of slavery in those territories. Thus, when thousands of representatives of both groups moved to Kansas to participate in the voting, a situation of confrontation and violence between the two was generated, which became known as Bleeding Kansas.
Answer: I think the answer is B. The Boston Tea Party
Explanation: The Stamp Act made colonists angry because they were forced to pay taxes, then Tea started to have tax so they disguised themselves and started throwing tea in the ocean which was then called the Boston Tea Party.
Machine Guns, Artillery Fire, and Mines
Answer: B. Military occupation of the South was ended
Specifically, Union troops were pulled from Florida, South Carolina, and Louisiana. This was known as the Compromise of 1877, which helped Rutherford Hayes to formalize the presidency (otherwise lawmakers were threatening to filibuster the results).