It seems that the BJP government’s decision to illegalise the sale of cattle for slaughter at animal markets has its roots in a PIL that quotes the five-yearly Gadhimai festival in Nepal, where thousands of buffaloes are taken from India to be sacrificed to ‘appease’ Gadhimai, the goddess of power.
The contradictions that emerge from cattle – here encompassing all bovines – slaughter rules in Nepal perplex many: despite being predominantly Hindu, animal sacrifice continues to be practised. Cow slaughter is explicitly prohibited even in Nepal’s new constitution since it is the national animal, yet the ritual sacrifice of buffaloes and the consumption of their meat is not frowned upon. There is also, in marked contrast to the Indian government’s blanket approach to cattle terminology, a lucid distinction between cows (both the male and female) and other ‘cattle’ species (such as buffaloes and yaks).
The emergence of this contradictory, often paradoxical, approach to cattle slaughter in Nepal is the result of a careful balancing act by the rulers of modern Nepal. The Shah dynasty and the Rana prime ministers often found themselves at a crossroads to explicitly define the rules of cattle slaughter. As rulers of a perceived ‘asal Hindu-sthan’, their dharma bound them to protect the cow – the House of Gorkha borrows its name from the Sanskrit ‘gou-raksha’ – but as they expanded into an empire, their stringent Brahminic rules came into conflict with des-dharma, or existing local customs, where cattle-killing was a norm. What followed was an intentionally ambiguous approach to cattle slaughter, an exercise in social realpolitik.
Answer:
1. The manager should be notified if you've got anything to complain about.
2. Before the end of the month, they'll grant you whether you've got the job or not.
3. The council has turned down planning permission, sorry.
4. Within ten working days, you've got to pay for everything.
5. You'll have to pay for it if you break anything.
Explanation:
Swap the subject and actor :)
I apologize if this is not entirely correct
Answer:
1. They both show the main character sacrificing her life for her principles.
2. They both show the main character experiencing a downfall and awaiting death.
3. They both show moments in the main characters' experiences that evoke pity.
Explanation:
What qualities of the tragic heroine do both of these passages reveal? Select three options.
"Dramatic irony" is the type of irony among the choices given in the question that was evident in Act IV, scene 1, of romeo and juliet, when paris meets juliet at friar lawrence's cell and says, "do not deny... that <span>you love me," and Juliet replies "I will confess to you that I love him".</span><span> The correct option is option "C".</span>
The words in this excerpt support the idea that the husband was very devoted to his wife is A). A man who aimed to please his pregnant wife.
<h3>What is Devotion?</h3>
This refers to the situation where a person has deep respect, love and reverence for a person or a thing where the person is doting on the other person or thing.
Hence, we can see that based on the given narration, we can see that there is the narration of the man and his pregnant wife and how he was devoted to her by doing some difficult things she asked for.
Therefore, option A is the correct answer.
Read more about devotion here:
brainly.com/question/14649217
#SPJ1
