A foil is the near complete opposite of the main character (whichever character they want you to find a foil for).
Rainsford and Whitney were good hunting friends with numerous similar interests. They could not be foils because of how close in similarity they were. Even when they disagreed on how animals felt about being hunted, Whitney seemed open to and intrigued by Rainsford's points and way of thinking.
Ivan is a near irrelevant character, being a mere Cossack who follows whatever General Zaroff says. He is mindless and has almost zero traits to even compare to Rainsford, let alone any traits aside from a mindless follower to begin with.
The answer would be General Zaroff. This is almost like the cliche protagonist vs antagonist foil. Both of them are hunters, but different kinds. Zaroff got bored with animals and wanted to hunt human people instead, whereas Rainsford had enjoyed the thrill of an animal hunt and thinks that the hunting of people is murder. Zaroff is more heartless and cold, a killer, if you will. Rainsford seems to think highly of actual people, and had no interest in playing Zaroff's game.
Its D because the word empathize is an action shes taking with the children. Closer is a noun, glacial is an adjective, and contentment is a noun. Only leaves empathize because its an act of <span>understanding or, sharing the feelings for another. :) Your welcome! Hope you pass!</span>
The answer is D. This strip mall will not only help me, ladies and gentlemen, but help all other struggling businesses in this difficult economy.
It is a good argument because it goes beyond his personal gain and uses a current problematic to convinve the listeners.
Answer:
D
. Like people, cities grow up with their own personalities and have both good and bad traits.
Explanation:
<em>The book, Chicago is all about the story of group of Egyptians doing their postgraduate studies in Chicago who are being controlled by the fellow student leader (Country's student body). The novel also shows racism in the state, the conflict between the Arabs and Western culture and the corruption in the Egyptian regime.</em>
It simply shows that cities such as Chicago have both the good and bad traits with it projects towards people
