Answer:
See Explanation
Explanation:
The options are not properly presented; hence, they can't be used to answer this question
First, we need to analyze the conditions:
- score > 100 implies bonus = 2 * score
- score between 50 and 100 implies bonus = score
- score < 50 implies bonus = 0
Writing the above as programming instructions, we have:
if(score > 100){//This represents the first condition
bonus = 2 * score;
}
else if(score >=50 && score<=100){//This represents the second
bonus = score;
}
else{//This represents the last condition
bonus = 0;
}
<em>Note that, we assume that all variables have been declared</em>
<em>The comments (//) were used for explanation purpose</em>
Answer:
Part A:
The cofounding variable is a factor that could cause a result on the experiment. This would be the people taking extra food.
Independent variable would be being asked to sign in or not and take free food, because independent variable is a variable that is changed or manipulated and in this case the people were split in half and the hypothesis is that the people who didn't sign in would take more food.
Operational definitions are important when conducting research because it defines all the variables in the experiment, so it can be replicated. The operational def for the dependent variable would be "Doing the right thing even though you aren't being watched"
Part B:
The data does not support the hypothesis because even the people who signed in could've taken extra food when the dean wasn't looking. The findings cannot be generalized to all students because some students could have been taught better and can differentiate between right and wrong. So the people who were not signed in could've just taken one burger and drink, and the people who were signed in might feel obligated to take more than one burger because they had signed in and didn't just come without signing in.
The study is not a naturalistic observation because the observer did not look at the people who took the food and which side took more food.
The statement is - False.
In the pre-industrial societies, the economy was far from being based on providing information and services. The economy was largely based on two things, agriculture and trade.
The agriculture was the basis and the dominant sector in the pre-industrial economy. The more agricultural products a nation had, the more it had to trade, thus becoming wealthy. This can easily be seen in the colonies that the European countries had in the pre-industrial period, where every inch of the land that was suitable for agriculture was used, and latter those products were shipped and traded in order to become wealthier.
Their attitude/ beliefs would change in order for the discomfort feeling to reduce. So they might make it up by making another decision with a better outcome to make up for the previous poor decision.
