Option I: 10 candy bars for $6.75
<span>6.75/10 = 0.68 </span>
<span>Option II: 12 candy bars for $7.25 </span>
<span>7.25 / 12 = 0.60 </span>
Answer:
Well, these simulation are based on the statistics (lognormal-distributed PE, χ²-distributed s²). If you believe that only the ‘gold-standard’ of subject-simulations are valid, we can misuse the function sampleN.scABEL.sdsims() – only for the 3- and 4-period full replicates and the partial replicate:
# define a reg_const where all scaling conditions are ‘switched off’
abe <- reg_const("USER", r_const = NA, CVswitch = Inf,
CVcap = Inf, pe_constr = FALSE)
CV <- 0.4
2x2x4 0.05 0.4 0.4 0.95 0.8 1.25 34 0.819161 0.8
Since the sample sizes obtained by all simulations match the exact method, we can be confident that it is correct. As usual with a higher number of simulations power gets closer to the exact value.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the answer is c 162
Step-by-step explanation:
formula for triangular prism: 1/2*b*h1*h2
substitute the values into the formula:
6*3*18=324
324/2=162
plz vote my answer the brainiest if it helps, thanks!
It is 10 because you subtract 10 from 36 then you get 20 the the half of 20 is 10. the answer is 10. la respuesta es 10.(diez)
Step-by-step explanation:
the volume of pyramid =
⅓× base area × height =
⅓× (½×7×5)×6 =
1/6 × 210 = 35 cm³
