1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrRa [10]
3 years ago
15

Which are examples of the discrimination that European Jews endured throughout history? Check all that apply.

History
2 answers:
Anna35 [415]3 years ago
8 0
<span>Jews who lived in Germany and had good jobs were not discriminated against.</span>
dalvyx [7]3 years ago
4 0

European Jews were forced to live in segregated communities.

European Jews were prohibited from owning land.

European Jews were barred from certain professions.

European Jews were subject to physical abuse, even murder.

European Jews were subject to arbitrary deportations.

You might be interested in
How was a successor to Muhammad chosen?
Ilya [14]
Was elected by the clans, just took the test
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The allies of Athens in the Delian League began to resent Athens mainly because of its
Elanso [62]

Answer:

The most important reason for the formation of the Peloponnesian League was? The allies of Athens in the Delian League began to resent Athens mainly because of its? A nation that joins another nation in some common effort, such as winning a war

Hopes this help have a great night!

5 0
3 years ago
What were the effects of the collapse of the bronze age
Luden [163]
The transitions were sudden and due of violence, and culturally disruptive
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. How does this excerpt summarize the
Marianna [84]
Chief Justice John Marshall stated last 1803 in the case of Marbury v. Madison that "It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."  

It implies that the judicial department applies the law and the understanding and interpretation therein would still be based on the designated person. If soever, the interpreter or representative in the judicial department would make any conflict with the intent, process, actual application of the law (the two representation of law), the courts would be the end to finalize the decision.



4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which answer best describes the impact of the McCulloch vs. Maryland court case? (5 points) The case proved that federal banks h
pishuonlain [190]
The case proved that the states cannot challenge the implied federal powers
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which countries were under Ancient Rome rule?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Nixon have to pick a new Vice President?
    14·2 answers
  • What year did Congress declare the star spangled banner the national anthem for the us
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think that culture is so important to groups? What elements of culture make it a necessary part of any human group or
    13·1 answer
  • What important impact did slave trade have on africa
    15·2 answers
  • Possesses help me get this right
    14·1 answer
  • What does the word segregated mean?<br><br> Plzzzzz help me
    10·2 answers
  • In your opinion, is today's United States government just and legitimate? Briefly explain your answer *
    9·1 answer
  • What was different about the political situation in the Holy Land between the map from the introduction (before the First Crusad
    12·1 answer
  • How did the 6th amendment advance progressive goals
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!