The labor market, also known as the job market, refers to the supply and demand for labor in which employees provide the supply and employers the demand. It is a major component of any economy and is intricately tied in with markets for capital, goods and services.
Answer: Because Germany was located in between potential enemies to its west (Britain, France) and a major potential enemy also in the east (Russia).
Context/detail:
Let's assume your question is referencing "The Great War," which we now know as World War I. There was much military buildup and an arms race between the nations of Europe and increased tensions between the nations of Europe during the early years of the 20th century. Along with increasing expenditures on military forces and navies, there was pressure to form alliances with other nations to strengthen a nation's defenses in case there was a war. The Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance set up in opposition to each other.
The Triple Entente aligned Britain, France and Russia all as allies with one another, sworn to come to each other's defense in time of war. That put Germany and its allies (Austria-Hungary and Italy*) in between those powers. Germany knew that if a major war broke out, it would need to fight on both its western and eastern front.
Because Russia and France were tied together in an alliance, and opposed to Germany, the Schlieffen Plan (developed by German field marshall Alfred von Schlieffen) determined that a quick strike against France on the western front would be necessary in order to focus any war efforts against Russia in the east. This played into the start of World War I, because when only Germany (along with Austria-Hungary) and Russia were involved in war declarations after the assassination of Austria's archduke Franz Ferdinand, the first thing the German army did was to go and attack France.
*<em>Note: Italy changed sides when the Great War began and sided with the Allies (Britain, France, Russia, etc) rather than the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, plus Bulgaria and the Ottoman Empire).</em>
The correct option is: "OPPRESSIVE"
Friedrich Engels was a philosopher, sociologist, journalist, revolutionary and German socialist theoretician. Engels was the son of the owner of a major textile factory in Manchester, England. Friend and collaborator of Karl Marx, was coauthor with this works like The situation of the working class in England (1845) and the Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848), fundamental for the birth of Marxism and the socialist, communist and union. He was political leader of the First International (1864) and the Second International (1889). He also helped Marx financially to publish Capital in 1867, and after his death, he edited the second and third volumes. In addition, Engels organized the notes of Marx to compose Theories on surplus value, which he later published as "fourth volume" of Capital.
Answer:
B, Allowing South Carolina to continue to segregate students by meeting the "separate but equal" criteria.
Explanation:
As shown in the question above, the education-related equalization effort that took place in South Carolina was a government program that aimed to build countless schools across the country, with the aim of providing quality education to the entire population regardless of the skin color of children. people.
This seems like a noble attitude, however this program was established to allow the state to segregate people based on their color. Using the criterion "separate, but equal", schools were built where only white students were accepted, black students, however, would have access to other schools that would only allow black students, but that would provide the same level of education and resources as schools for white students.
In this way, the state would provide education for young blacks, but would maintain the concept of racial segregation.
<span>I think the US use propaganda in order to gain support from neutral countries.With the help their resources, they were able to come up with creative political cartoons. Most of these political cartoon may seem harmless. However, they denote strong political meanings from the government</span><span />
