1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
3 years ago
5

Which of the following was an effect of rapid urbanization?

History
1 answer:
Klio2033 [76]3 years ago
7 0
Poor air and water quality, insufficient water availability, waste-disposal problems, and high energy consumption are exacerbated by the increasing population density and demands of urban environments. Strong city planning will be essential in managing these and other difficulties as the world's urban areas swell.
You might be interested in
What did white southerners try to cast themselves as?
DIA [1.3K]
They cast themselves as Carpetbagger’s
5 0
3 years ago
What is the purpose of this document?​
Luden [163]
This there suppose to be an image
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
while this country never formally joined to Axis Powers or joined World War ll, it did form an alliance with Germany and did in
Otrada [13]

Axis would have probably wiped out most of its West-European enemies. Canada would probably have tried to fight against America and failed, getting its armies crushed, or stayed on the defensive. Hitler would probably have had more troops and peace of  mind tromping around around the Soviet grounds, and would have lost a lot less manpower than when the US actually went to war in the real WWII. Since I'm assuming that in this hypothetical scenario, the US was allied with Japan, Pearl Harbor never happened. Japan and America would both have undisputed hold of the Pacific, with America's (unsunken) battleships and aircraft carriers along with Japanese suprbattleships like the Yamato, and dual force garrisons on the pacific islands. America might have invaded the lower Americas as well, if it didn't stop at securing the border. Mexico might have joined in to help the Axis powers. Then Hitler would still turn on Stalin, still loose an ungodly portion of his army in Russia, get driven back, and start losing the war in the European theatre, at least until axis forces come to back him up, primarily in the form of American Axis soldiers. Then America would lose many men in the Russian front, until it finally invaded Russia somehow (probably after many years and the combined nuclear armaments research being conducted by the US and Nazi Germany.) After invading Russia, Hitler will grow pompous and attempt to invade America with his already weakened force. He would attempt to destroy the remaining American troops in the European/Asian Theatre. America and Japan would probably ally with each other to maintain their hold of the Pacific, and fight back, with a smaller scale D-Day happening (Only made up of Americans) being launched from the invaded and annexed New American Britain or New German Britain or whatever. America would invade Germany, while Germany cannot invade America (see other Quora posts for explanations on why it is virtually impossible to invade America). America ends up with territories and troops spread all across the Pacific, Africa, Russia, Europe, and Asia, with probably troops in Canada and Mexico as well. Consequently, the troops will be brought down through the freedom fighters and rebellions that will ultimately pop up. Hitler shoots himself in the bunker as well.

Lots of bloodshed. Thank god it didn't happen this way! A lot of countries would be utterly in ruins after this version of the World War, not just Poland and Germany and England and Russia and Korea and China (etc.), but who knows how many more countless places. Not to say that I am okay with WWII happening how it did anyway, since it was extremely bloody as well, but... the real WWII was a giant bloody clash of death. This hypothetical one wouldn't have been a clash. It would have been a giant cluster that resulted in possibly twice or three times as many deaths, mostly more civilian deaths in general.

5 0
3 years ago
The term "Columbian Exchange" is used to describe the exchange of goods, technology, education, and diseases between the America
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

Because they had <u>a massive exploration by the mother country</u> (the one responsible by the conquest), <u>which took a considerable part of their goods.</u>

Explanation:

The Latin American colonies were different from the British Colonies (Thirteen Colonies and Canada) <u>because they were explored massively by Portugal and Spain during the three centuries of colonialism.</u> The Iberian countries were following an economic and political idea called <u>Mercantilism</u> which, as the main aspect, was<u> the exploration of a colony, taking the goods and sending it to the mother country. Only a small part was left for the colony.</u> And why those colonies don't rebel against the mother country, you may ask. Because since the very moment the Iberian countries began their colonization, they didn't leave any possibility of revolution, with laws and severe control of the settlers and natives. <u>Any try of revolution or riot was massively dismissed with violence.</u>

7 0
2 years ago
Which term refers to the clusters of makeshift cardboard and scrap metal homes built by unemployed people during the Great Depre
ANTONII [103]
Shantytowns

Hope this helped!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Walt Whitman was one of the greatest of American poets -- what was his stand on the war and the concept of Manifest Destiny?
    15·1 answer
  • Match the correct government type with its description.
    11·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP
    12·2 answers
  • Who was the exiled russian revolutionary who took control of the revolution?
    14·1 answer
  • How did Otto I gain support from many church bishops
    11·1 answer
  • Which form or government shares goods and services equally, and the political power is distributed among the people?
    15·1 answer
  • 13. Jason is collecting rainwater in buckets.
    14·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes how a historian would use a transcript of speech
    7·2 answers
  • What was remarkable about karuschev denunciation of Stalin?
    10·1 answer
  • I need a paragraph teaching me about Mesopotamia and one about Egypt History​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!