They mostly developed because men did most of the work. Agrarian societies required hard work and toiling out in the field while pastoralism required people to take care of numerous animals at once and these animals often needed human strength and speed. Thanks to this, men were the ones who did those jobs and since they were valued more than taking care of the household, gender inequality originated.
<span>Since a peasant owns little property and works in the employ of a landowner or business owner, he or she would have little concern for the loss of property and be less concerned if the flow of products is disrupted. He or she would also have more incentive to invest in a revolution that upended the status quo and allowed for more mobility within the social and economic hierarchies. The merchant would be invested in quelling any rebellion that would interrupt the economy and cause destruction of property and good.</span>
True i do believe but im not 100% sure this isnt my strong suite
The nation that has the absolute advantage in peanuts is India.
<h3>How to solve for the absolute advantage of these countries</h3>
a. The country that has the absolute advantage in the pounds of peanuts is India. They are able to produce 10 million worth of the product.
b. This is in the attachment
c. From the calculated opportunity costs, India has been shown to have the comparative advantage in peanuts so they have to specialize here.
The US on the other hand has to specialize in pecans because they have the comparative advantage in it.
d) The PPC for each country is a diagram
e. ) The terms of trade would be a pound of peanut for a pound of pec an for the countries.
Based on this the US would produce 10 units for pecans. They would use 5 units and exchange the remaining 5 units of pecans for 5 units of peanuts from India.
India is also going to do likewise.
Read more on production possibility curve here:
brainly.com/question/2601596
#SPJ1