Answer:
Yanta Co. has a higher exposure to exchange rate risk than Diz Co.
The reason is that Yanta Co. does not have net inflows of euros. Instead, its euro transactions yield net outflows.
It will always be in need of euros to settle its foreign debts or obligations, unlike Diz Co. with foreign assets.
Explanation:
a) Data and Analysis:
Diz Co. has net cash inflows of euros and net cash inflows of swiss francs
Yanta Co. has net cash outflows of euros and net cash inflows of swiss francs
b) Exposure to exchange rate risk or currency risk is the financial risk arising from fluctuations in the value of the US dollars against the Euro or Swiss Francs in which Diz Co. has some foreign assets while Yanta Co. has foreign obligations.
Answer: $6.00
Explanation:
From the question, we can see that the productivity in the United States is (45/9) = 5 times higher than that of Mexico.
Therefore, the wages in Mexico should be 5 times lower than the wages paid to the workers in the United States. This will be:
= $30.00 / 5
= $6.00
Therefore, in order for the firm to reduce its wage cost per unit of output by moving to Mexico, the wages in Mexico must be below $6.00 per hour.
Answer:
Explanation below.
Explanation:
The recommendation that I will give or propose is that the agreement must have a legal backing.
This is the best recommendation that a wise person can proposes. It is a show of height of stupidity when an individual go into conjunction with another person without any written agreement that is backed legally. This because, when there is a problem in the future, the documents will be a way to solve it.
The other secondary option is written and signed agreement with video recording. This is not as good as the one mentioned above, but can still be considered as an alternative.
