The correct answer is Martin Luther King JR.
Martin Luther King JR advocated for non-violent resistance to Jim Crow laws and believed that the Civil Rights movement could only be successful if it was nonviolent.
The others on the list disagreed.
Full Civil rights for African Americans.
Hope this helped :)
The new industrialization made many strains on the perfect of popular government in light of the fact that many individuals lost their human rights. Individuals were chipping away at low wages and were played off each other to simply wind up noticeably heartless workers in assembly lines. Equality was lost between the rich and poor. The rich settled on every one of the choices which deciphered many existences of the laborers which were generally in negative ways. The fairness of ladies to men was all the while battling; ladies were being paid lower compensation and worked similarly as hard. Youngsters were given something to do, which insulted the communist changes. The development of the immense enterprises and extraordinary fortunes were extraordinarily fruitful with industrializing another America however made a danger to its own particular subjects. Numerous families lived in dread of getting to be plainly jobless. Laborers had no security and the legislature wasn't sufficiently speedy to authorize manages and to direct them towards specialists in production lines. The rule that America embraced were barbarous, yet at any rate there were numerous union work gatherings, despite the fact that they were shot down ordinarily, regardless we remember them today.
Answer:
Supporters of Laissez faire believe that this type of system promotes more incentives to trade and economic growth, in addition to encouraging freedom among companies.
Supporters of economic intervention, on the other hand, believe that the intervention promotes fairer and more equitable trade and allows new companies to become as influential as old companies, which will promote economic growth.
Explanation:
Economic intervention allows the government of a country to impose limits and interference in trade and the productive sector. These limitations prevent economically strong companies from dominating an entire productive sector, promoting more commercial fairness and allowing new companies to emerge in addition to allowing small companies to grow in the same sector as large companies.
Laissez Faire, on the other hand, discredits any government intervention in trade and this imposes freedom on companies and industries, which will allow full production and vast economic growth.
I believe the answer is A, Pollution of the environment, hope this helps :)
