1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frez [133]
3 years ago
9

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

History
1 answer:
Leya [2.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Please don't cheat Elina, while I have this test tommorow since I didn't have social studies today, please don't cheat.

Explanation:

Rather than eating hot cheetos and facetiming your friends such as hi*za and reb***a you should study! Studying is the key to success rather than gossip and other stuff. The answer is wisdom, nothing less and nothing more. Go on the right path to success not the wrong way. Oh and, I ain't never seen two pretty best friends, it's always one of them that gotta be ugly.

You might be interested in
The Khmer Empire at its height in the 1400s included parts of which areas on this map?
yaroslaw [1]

Please post a picture of the map

3 0
4 years ago
The purpose of this speech was to?
prohojiy [21]
Answer: D

explanation: He sought to emphasize the historic nature of the events at Pearl Harbor, implicitly urging the American people never to forget the attack and memorialize its date.


not sure of my answer sorry
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these was one cause of the outbreak of the Red Scare?
elena55 [62]
The revolution in Russia is the one among the following choices that was one cause of the outbreak of Red scare. 
3 0
3 years ago
Objects that people left behind are often the only clues we have to how they lived. True Or False
krek1111 [17]
The answer is true. Have a good day
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did both the union and the confederacy consider control of the border states crucial?
    6·1 answer
  • What did the Marshall Court rulings that supported the “sanctity of contracts” and federal law over state law boost?
    7·1 answer
  • Why is it good to have 2 major parties?
    7·1 answer
  • How did montesquieu's system reflect john locke's ideas about government?
    8·1 answer
  • Montaigne believes that teachers should a. listen to their students. b. tell their students what to do. c. make students memoriz
    10·2 answers
  • What type of personal behavior is expected on the hajj?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think equality between the racist would have come to America without the civil rights movement?
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the nations that made up the Triple Alliance.
    8·1 answer
  • what were three requirements or qualifications for a person to be eligible for the position of u.s. president?
    6·1 answer
  • Select the correct boxes.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!