The correct alternative regarding tax revenue:
<u>B-Personal income tax is currently the largest source of government revenue in South Africa.</u>
<u>Direct </u><u>Taxes</u>
- it is levied on earnings and activities conducted.
- the burden of tax cannot be shifted in case of direct tax.
- it is paid directly by individual concerned.
- it is paid after the income reaches in the hands of the taxpayer
- Tax collection is difficult.
- instance income tax, wealth tax etc.
<u>Indirect </u><u>Taxes</u>
- it is levied on product or services.
- the burden of tax shifted for indirect taxes
- It is paid by way of one man or woman however he recovers the same from another person i.e. person who actually bear the tax ultimate consumer.
- it is paid before goods/service reaches the taxpayer.
- Tax collection is exceptionally easier
- Example GST, excise duty custom duty sale tax carrier tax
Learn more about Tax brainly.com/question/16423331
#SPJ9
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
Answer:
Monopolist can charge a higher price from women.
Explanation:
A monopolist is producing 100,000 units of a product.
The price of the product is $5 per unit.
The price elasticity of demand for men at this price is -3.5.
The price elasticity for women, on the other hand, is -0.8.
This means that the men have a relatively elastic demand for the product. While on the other hand, women have relatively inelastic demand. This implies that if the price is increased the demand from women will not change by a greater proportion.
While demand from men can change to a greater proportion because of a change in price.
In this situation, the firm can charge a higher price from women. This is an example of third-degree price discrimination.
