The correct answer here is definitely A.
The excerpt shows the wilderness it is dog eat dog world and the only the strongest will survive. This is even explicitly said in the sentence:
<span>The
blood-longing became stronger than ever before. He was a killer, a
thing that preyed, living on the things that lived, unaided, alone, by
virtue of his own strength and prowess, surviving triumphantly in a
hostile environment where only the strong survived.
</span>
<span></span>The wilderness does not care and it is a hostile environment and if you want to survive you have to strong.
<span />
Explanation:
Not at all brother.
We should see the content not the gender.
Answer:
1. It reflected the purpose of her speech as it provided clarity for her determination to protect her kingdom against European powers/invaders.
2. The main goal of the crusades by the Europeans was to install a Catholic ruler in England and this was resisted by Queen Elizabeth 1 who wanted England to be a Protestant or Anglican state.
Explanation:
Parallelism is the use of the same grammatical structure in a text. It provides contrast and balance in the text. It also helps to establish clarity in the intentions of the writer. Queen Elizabeth 1 made good use of parallelism by providing contrasts and comparing the things she could tolerate and the ones that could not be tolerated. Her speech is made up of contrasts used in the same lines to make her points stand out and to remove any doubts in the minds of her subjects.
For example, she said that she was there as a monarch 'not for her recreation or disport but for the heat of the battle, and if necessary to die for her subjects'. This would make her intentions stand out in the hearts of her subjects.
Answer:
A). Concentrates on issues, not people.
Explanation:
Constructive conflict is defined as a conflict that aims to discover the cause or reason for the conflict is by proffering a unanimously accepted solution to resolve it.
As per the question, such conflicts would 'focus on issues instead of people' by identifying a specific issue, discussing the sources that have led to that particular issue, problem, or conflict and this mutual discussion serves to provide a concerted solution to the issue. This is the reason why it is considered as 'constructive' due to its positive and effective approach to bringing a solution to the issue. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the answer.
