Answer:
Cash paid 168,000
Explanation:
Assuming that there were no inventory at start of the year
purchases during the year :
Sold = 155
Closing inventory = 21
Total purchase (155+21) = 176
Cash paid for merchandise = total purchase - increase in liability
Cash paid = 176-8 = 168
Answer:
c. $363 million
Explanation:
We can compute this easily by making a retained earning extract from the balance sheet at the closing date,
Opening Retained earnings $12,329
Add retained earnings for the year $556
Less: Dividends paid $363
Closing Retained earnings $12,522
Reverse calculating the information gives us c. $363 million
Hope that helps.
Answer:
B. a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result reducing the time it takes to perform certain activities
Explanation:
According to PMI, a project is a temporary endeavor undertaken to create a unique product, service, or result." Unlike other business activities, a project has a clear starting point and ending point, after which the people and resources dedicated to the project are reassigned. PMI is a project management association, which develops a standard for project, program, people, organization, etc. Also, they provide world- recognized certification.
Answer: B - $7,150
Explanation: Standard taxation is an option by IRS to reduce an inidvidual taxable income. this is subject to an individuals filling status.
Phil who is aged 20, single and who can claim a dependent on his parents tax filling return. As of 2019, his standard tax deduction is limited to his earned income plus $350.
According to the above question, Phil earns $7,000 as wages plus $150 in interest income.
From the above information, Phil has a standard tax of $7,150.
This can indicate fraud, duress, or undue influence.
In contracts, "consideration" is the things of value each side gives up in an exchange. So if one side gives $1 for a cup of coffee, that might be ok. Now, consider if the contract was to sell your entire house for $1! That would be a shockingly inadequate exchange because even the cheapest home is worth way more than $1.
In that case, the judge might look at <em><u>why</u></em> someone would be willing to give up so much for so little. Were they falsely told there home was worth nothing or maybe told that they would get $1 upfront and more later? That would be <u>fraud</u>. Were they told to sign the contract with a gun pointed at their head? That is an example of <u>duress</u>. Finally, did the person helping them with the contract have undue influence? If your boss, parent, or favorite celebrity advises you to do something that you don't want to do, but you worry about what they will thing if you don't, then you were a victim of their <u>undue influence. </u>
