He is considered important today for his laws. He came up with the saying “An eye for an eye”. He set himself apart from the other kings by setting a large list of laws that caused mixed reactions. For example, one of his laws were “If a man knocks the eye out of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out too.” Some viewed his laws as cruel while others viewed them as fair.
That statement is False
all states in the US have enacted balance budget amendments. But the amendments are still a gray area in Vermont since they technically still haven't been able to fulfill the balance budget amendments
C is your answer, because I took this test before.
After the September 11 terrorist attacks, Osama bin Laden argued that Al Qaeda was perfectly justified in killing all those people inside the World Trade Center because they weren't r:eally civilians–they were complicit in U.S. might and misdeeds. Didn't their taxes fund America's CIA assassinations and war planes? As every American understood perfectly well at the time, the attack that day would not have been justified even if all office workers in the Twin Towers had voted for a president and supported a military that perpetrated grave sins in the Middle East. Or even, indeed, if they were all subletting spare bedrooms to U.S. soldiers.
Killing civilians is wrong, no matter how often those who do it insist that the humans they killed weren't really innocent. Everyone understands this truth when the civilians being killed are one's countrymen or allies–but forget it quickly when the civilians are citizens of a country one is fighting or rooting against in war, even though the civilizational taboo against killing civilians becomes no less important.
use what you need
:)
The maintenance of transportation and communication networks, the distribution of land according to the equal-field system, and the reliance on a
<span>bureaucracy of merit are all reasons that the "D. Tang" dynasty succeeded, since this allowed them to be highly competitive in a variety of markets. </span>