Answer:
laissez-faire is a French term that means, 'Leave alone.'
Explanation:
Answer:
Roosevelt's hope was to provide a rationale for why the United States should abandon the isolationist policies that emerged from World War I.
In that context, he summarized the values of democracy behind the bipartisan consensus on international involvement that existed at the time.
*The first is freedom of speech and expression—everywhere in the world.
*The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way—everywhere in the world.
*The third is freedom from want—which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants—everywhere in the world.
*The fourth is freedom from fear—which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor—anywhere in the world.
Answer: Growing and selling opium.
Explanation:
The group known as theTaliban emerged in the year of 1994 as part of the Afghan Civil War. It was formed by many students (talib) from southern and eastern Afghanistan from traditional Islamic schools. The ISI and the Pakistani military have given financial, logistical and military support to the Taliban as said by the international community and the Afghan government itself. The way the Taliban achieved their economy was by imposing a 50% tax on any company operating in the country and a 6% import tax on anything brought from other countries. Under the Transit treaty between Afghanistan and Pakistan a network of smuggling happened. By 1996-1999 Mullah Omar made changes to drug dealing. The Taliban controlled 96% of Afghanistan's poppy fields and made opium its largest source of taxation. It is said that it was drug money which funded the weapons and ammunition for their war purposes.
Paine believed that Britain was unworthy of being called a republic because:
1) The US didn't have any say in what they can or cannot do. (they didn't have a representative
2) The British literally had a king (George III)
etc
hope this helps
