<h3>Second Amendment:</h3>
Protection to citizens bearing an arm.
<h3>Opinion:</h3>
If you think about it, it could go both ways. It can benefit the U.S. by reducing the amount of deaths each year by taking away arms but it can also increase the amount protests. Note that this amendment has been ratified into the Bill of Rights for more than 200 years so it wouldn't make much sense to remove it. Even if arms were removed from the country entirely people could still make arms with the technology we have today.
Best of Luck!
Answer:
The answer is A. have a great day.
Explanation:
Answer:
I think the rich fear the poor uprising as they are greedy about their wealth and also quite jealous that the poor would turn better than them in the future and reach their standard.
C; Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was too weak to provide assistance during Shays' Rebellion. The only other course of option would be the Massachusetts Militia, a state run militia.
"<span>D. With no centralized government to impose order, lawlessness increased" is a good description of how life changed initially, but soon local governments took control. </span>