Answer:
c an idea
Explanation:
can't have a business without an idea
Using the Gordon Growth Model (a.k.a. Dividend Discount Model), the intrinsic value of a stock can be calculated, exclusive of current market conditions. In this model, the value of the stock is equated to the present value of the stock's future dividends.
<span>Value of stock (P0) = D1 / (k - g)
</span>where
D1<span> = </span><span>expected annual </span>dividend<span> per share in the following year </span>
<span>k = the investor's discount rate or required </span>rate of return
g = the expected dividend growth rate
<u>From the problem:</u>
The value of stock is $10.80
D1 is $0.40
g is 0.08
k is unknown
Solution:
Rearranging the equation for Gordon Growth Model to solve for k:
k = (D1/P0) + g
Substituting the variables with the given values,
k = (0.40/10.80) + 0.08
k = 0.1170
In percent form, this is
0.1170 * 100% = 11.70%.
Thus, the total rate of return on the stock is 11.70%.
Answer:
$205,000
Explanation:
Let us assume Owners' equity at the beginning be X
So, the Increase in Owners' equity is $260,000 - X
As we know that
Accounting equation is
Total assets = Total liabilities + total stockholder equity
So,
Total Increase in Assets = Total Increase in Liabilities + Increase in Owners' equity
$134,000 = $79,000 + $260,000 - X
$134,000 = $339,000 - X
So, the X =
= $339,000 - $134,000
= $205,000
Answer:
What happens to the wealth effect of a change in the aggregate price level as a result of this allocation of assets?
- The consumers' wealth effect will rise since the slope of the aggregate demand curve increases as the prices of assets increases, i.e. the slope of the aggregate demand curve becomes steeper as customers become wealthier.
Will aggregate demand still be downward sloping? Why or why not?
- The aggregate demand curve sill still be downward sloping because as the price of a good or service increases, the quantity demanded will still decrease. An inverse relationship exists between price changes and quantity demanded.
