Fish first then Apes then Humans
Answer:
- Freedom from the influence of the Great Britain
They no longer had to put up with the pressure of having to elect officials that is wanted by the Great Britain. They can elect someone who can genuinely care for the country's development.
- Ability to forms their own laws that are suitable to their own culture
some of the laws that made during the colonization designed to conformed to western principles / philosophy. Making own their constitution means that India no longer have to do this.
- Ability to form an alliance outside of Great Britain's social circle.
Such as Russia and China for example. They won't be able to form an alliance with them if they are still under the British influence.
- Create the economy that benefit Indian people
Under British's rule, the trades laws that passed will most likely benefit the Great Britain rather than the Indian people. They will decide which products gets the subsidy and how much the products they can export. But this commodities might not be popular In Indian market.
Answer: The goods have a better quality
Explanation:
The quality of a product is down to how well and painstakingly the producer takes his time to work on what he's selling. An organization which invests much more time into productivity will offer a better product than that which offer lesser time to producing. When more time is involved in productivity, the customer gains with a quality product.
They would win the lawsuit because they are entitled to theyre own opinion and should never have been fired for it in the first place. so ive narrowed it down to the top 2 because i know for a fact the company wont win and they were fired without due process and number two is not in the constitution so it is the first one .
the employees will win because the constitution prevents them from being fired without due process.
