Answer:
have you tired looking on ebay
Total assets=Total liabilities+ Total equity
=> Total equity= total asset - total liabilities
a. Share holders equity=(11100-9300)= $1800
b. Share holders equity=(8700-9300)= -600 ~ 0
Rounded -600 to nearest whole number, that is 0
<h3>
What are shareholders?</h3>
A shareholder may be a individual or institution that has contributed cash in a enterprise in trade for a “share” of the possession. That proprietorship is spoken to by common or preferred offers issued by the company and held (i.e., claimed) by the shareholder. The shareholders are the proprietors of the company and give money related backing in return for potential profits over the lifetime of the company.
To learn more about shareholder, visit;
brainly.com/question/15186298
#SPJ4
Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Here, Income elasticity of demand for burger is negative because burger is considered as inferior good for this person. There is a inverse relationship between the income of an individual and demand for a inferior good which means that as the income of a consumer increases, as a result demand for inferior good decreases whereas demand for normal good increases with increased income level. Income elasticity of demand for normal good is positive.
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
<span>In pure competition, producers compete exclusively on the basis of p</span>roduct features.
