Answer:
Post-1945 immigration to the United States differed fairly dramatically from America’s earlier 20th- and 19th-century immigration patterns, most notably in the dramatic rise in numbers of immigrants from Asia. Beginning in the late 19th century, the U.S. government took steps to bar immigration from Asia. The establishment of the national origins quota system in the 1924 Immigration Act narrowed the entryway for eastern and central Europeans, making western Europe the dominant source of immigrants. These policies shaped the racial and ethnic profile of the American population before 1945. Signs of change began to occur during and after World War II. The recruitment of temporary agricultural workers from Mexico led to an influx of Mexicans, and the repeal of Asian exclusion laws opened the door for Asian immigrants. Responding to complex international politics during the Cold War, the United States also formulated a series of refugee policies, admitting refugees from Europe, the western hemisphere, and later Southeast Asia. The movement of people to the United States increased drastically after 1965, when immigration reform ended the national origins quota system. The intricate and intriguing history of U.S. immigration after 1945 thus demonstrates how the United States related to a fast-changing world, its less restrictive immigration policies increasing the fluidity of the American population, with a substantial impact on American identity and domestic policy.
Explanation:
Answer:
1. communication improvements
2. Embargo Act of 1807
3. new power sources
Explanation:
Hope it helps!
Have a great day/night! ^_^
Answer: C-focused on mining and agriculture
Explanation:
As the early Americans adhered to the Manifest Destiny and expanded to the Western part of the Continent, they engaged in different activities from their Northwestern counterparts.
The territories that the Americans took over to the west had fertile land for agriculture as well as rich mineral deposits which led to minning. This often put them at loggerheads with the Native Americans and differentiated them from the North Eastern states which were more industrialized.
Answer:
Don Ray’s desire to gain insight into his home country of Canada took him to an unexpected place — Africa.
While in university, Ray was faced with the choice of studying either Canadian or African politics.
“I thought that I would better understand my country by understanding what was happening in other parts of the world and then bringing lessons back from there to Canada.”
Now a professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Calgary, Ray is still learning lessons in Africa that he hopes to share with the North.
Explanation:
I would create a peaceful world where everyone got along and I would also end world hunger.
