Ibsen's Hedda Gabler can best be categorized as a problem play.
HG Wells develops his characters in a very coherent and objective way in the story, allowing each character to extend the reader's understanding of the text.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Wells is a very effective author in character development.
- This is because he allows each character to show a different aspect of the story that allows the reader to have a greater understanding of all elements of the narrative.
- In the time traveler, for example, we can see the importance of science, the dangers of observing strange worlds, and the adaptability of human beings.
- Weena's development shows the need for contact and evolution without responsibility, furthermore, it shows how advancement and high evolution can trigger negative characteristics.
- The development of the Morlocks shows the reader the strength of the working class and the danger of neglecting it.
In this case, we can see that in "The Time Machine," Wells uses character development to show specific elements and characteristics of society and human life in general.
More information:
brainly.com/question/15771261?referrer=searchResults
3.2 - 5.1n - 3n + 5 = 3.2 + 5 - 5.1n - 3n = 8.2 - 8.1n
One of the scenarios when you were talking with someone and your communication was interrupted was when a loud helicopter flew by causing a lot of noise.
<h3>What is noise in communication?</h3>
Noise in communication is any noise that distorts the ability of the speaker to pass across their message and the ability of the listener to hear what is being said.
It is to be noted that noise in communication can be internal or external. All kinds of noises in communication can be managed.
Learn more about communication;
brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ1
Answer:
From "On Being A Cripple" by Nancy Mairs
The claim is "I am a cripple."
Explanation:
This claim by Nancy is an assertion by her that something is. Usually, as Nancy is making the declaration, she does not provide any evidence to support her affirmation. This is because the readers of this story cannot ascertain why Nancy concludes that she is crippled. If some evidence is given, the claim remains subjective as it is the narrator's personal opinion. After all, she can still claim that she is divinely and extremely blessed in her physical condition.
Nancy Mairs (1986) wrote this short story to question the imprecise descriptions that society has been coining to label some people who are not like others in physical look, as if lessening the truth or bluntness about a person's condition could lessen the pains. For Nancy, she disagrees totally. Instead, she finds meaning and humor on being described as a cripple, the plain truth about her physical condition. She states that she is simply physically crippled. No euphemism should be intended.
Even as I am checking my write-up on this issue, it is being reported as "sensitive" instead of "vulgar." This shows that our society is relegating truth to niceties, just to pander to the sensibilities of others.
