Answer:
The evaluation of the international and domestic political environment: Foreign policy is made and applied within an international and domestic political context, which must be understood by a state to determine the best foreign policy option. For example, a state may need to respond to an international crisis.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/14729248#readmore
Explanation:
Answer:
But... isn't it past 11:59. Well, you could always do Annie Heloise Abel.
Explanation:
The federalist papers make the case for a federal system in the U.S. This would create a strong central government that is checked by state and local governments. The main idea is that people are inherently fractious and no ones faction should gain complete power.
Also, by allowing different layers of government, people are both involved and also there is a balance of power.
Opposed to the federalism, where people who only wanted states to have power and really no central government. This was refuted by the federalist as causing weakness in countries especially in the foreign affairs.
They are alike insofar that they both deal with with people from minorities and and the discrimination against people who were not of European descent. In Mendez v. Westminster it was about Mexican American people while in the Magnuson Act it was about the Chinese American population and discrimination against them.
I think the best answer would be D. motif.
<span>Archetype is a very typical example of something, such as Hitler could be an archetype of evil. In a story-telling, archetype is a recurrent symbol or motif such as a typical good person or a typical bad person. </span>
