1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Annette [7]
3 years ago
15

5. Give an example of an election where a 3rd party candidate potentially changed the

History
1 answer:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

I would talk about Theodore Roosevelt! He was a third party candidate, however, he didn't win the first time but did gain a larger percent of the vote for a third party candidate (27%). Another great one you could talk about is Ross Perot who won 19% of the popular vote but was beaten by Nixon.  

You might be interested in
What does “Join or Die” stand for?
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

"Join or die" stands for the the colonies are weak but if they join together they can win the war

Explanation:

hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
4. Which examples of Gothic architecture survive today? Select all that apply. (3 points)
Anarel [89]

Answer:

Abbeys

Cathedrals

universities

Explanation:

The gothic architecture was a style that flourished in Europe, around the late medieval age, it has dark colors and was largely used in cathedrals and churches, the Notre Dame´s cathedral is one of the greatest examples of Gothic architecture, for its seriousness and closeness to religion, many universities and abbeys have been built in that style and have kept gothic for over 6 centuries. Stained glass windows and high vaults as ceilings are the main characteristics of this architectural current.

5 0
3 years ago
The anti-Federalists lost and the Constitution was eventually adopted by the 13 states. However, many scholars argue that the an
Dominik [7]

Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.

Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.

​​​​​​Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”

Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D

6 0
2 years ago
The league of nations failed to do all of the following after world war 1 except
Lana71 [14]
The answer is c, hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
With extensive ______ especially of Barcelona, Franco’s Nationalists slowly broke the Republicans’ fighting spirit.Barcelona fel
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

With extensive bombings, especially of Barcelona, Franco’s Nationalists slowly broke the Republicans’ fighting spirit. Barcelona fell in January 1939, and Madrid did so in March 1939. The war was over .

Explanation:

The Spanish Civil War was a conflict in which the Second Spanish Republic and leftist groups fought a revolt of right-wing fascists and nationalists led by General Francisco Franco, who succeeded in overthrowing the republican government and establishing a dictatorship.

Republicans were made up of a range of left-wing groups ranging from centrists who supported electoral democracy to proponents of communist or anarchist revolutionary change; their strength was primarily urban (although landless peasants were among them) and secular, and they were particularly strong in Catalonia and the relatively conservative Basque Country - two regions to which the republican government gave great autonomy. The fascist rebels who eventually won the war had primarily the support of large and wealthy landowners and the church, who supported the centralization of power.  

Although the war lasted only three years, the political situation was already tense and full of violence in the previous few years. The number of victims is disputed; estimates most often speak of a figure between 500,000 and 1,000,000 dead. Many of these victims, however, were not the result of hostilities, but the result of brutal mass executions by both sides. The war began with military uprisings throughout Spain and its colonies, which were followed by republican reprisals against those considered allies of the rebels: the church. Massacres were committed against the Catholic clergy, churches and monasteries were burned. At the dawn of the war, the Franco regime initiated a thorough cleansing of Spanish society from everything that had anything to do with left-wing parties and everything connected with the Second Republic in general, including trade unions and political parties. Archives were confiscated, houses were searched, and undesirable individuals were often imprisoned, exiled, or killed.

The political consequences of the war resonated outside the borders of Spain and fueled passions in international intellectual and political circles. Republican sympathizers declared this war a struggle between "tyranny and democracy", or "fascism and freedom", and many young idealists joined international brigades in the 1930s, believing that saving the Spanish Republic was the idealistic goal of that era. Franco's supporters, however, saw the war as a battle between the "red hordes" (communism and anarchism) and "Christian civilization." But these two opposing views were inevitably oversimplifications: both sides had different, and often conflicting, ideologies within their ranks.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need some help please, What is a description of the Reconstruction Amendments and what did they do and what were they supposed
    12·1 answer
  • Where are the three branches of Christianity distributed in Europe?
    15·1 answer
  • What basic developments characterized the industrial revolution?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the main purpose of the US reply?
    15·1 answer
  • The term New South describes the work of Southerners in changing their:
    8·2 answers
  • Which two statements about Oklahoma's original constitution are true?
    11·1 answer
  • What's is an important Chinese innovation for writing and bookmaking?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the term that means a person declares a law unjust, refuses to obey the law, and suffers the consequences, such as arres
    15·2 answers
  • One of the results of the chaos created by the Vietnam war was that a neighboring
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the historical legacy and importance of Sojourner Truth.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!