The correct answer is C. Figurative language
Explanation:
Figurative language refers to the non-literal language, this implies figurative languages uses words and phrases in a non-conventional way, this includes the use of metaphor, simile, personification, onomatopoeia, and other literary figures.
The excerpt presented is a clear example of figurative language because it uses words and phrases in a non-conventional way, this can be seen in "like pale flags" that is an example of simile in which the author compares the curtains to flags to express how the move; also this can be seen in "the wine-colored rug" that the author uses to express the color of the rug, and it "as wind does on the sea" that uses comparison to describe the way the curtains form a shadow over the rug.
A thirteen year old living in India, while she is still living at home. She is happy with her parents and brothers, though her life is strictly controlled by tradition. Soon her parents scrape together a dowry and she finds herself married.
The bridegroom's parents had lied to her family in order to get enough money together to take their son, who is very ill, to the great Ganges River. Their motives are good (they want to save their son's life) but their deception changes Koly's life forever.
When her husband dies, her life goes from bad to worse. Her mother-in-law (her Sass), abandons her alone in Vrindavan, the holy city, where many widows are sent to live by families who do not want to support them.
Even with this unexpected turn of events, Koly makes a life for herself and finds true happiness. Her character is a very strong one and deserves a lot of credit for the future she carves out for herself. No matter what, she is always true to herself.
Answer:
A grammatical morpheme is a word or word ending that makes a sentence grammatically correct.
Explanation:
<u>A grammatical morpheme can be an entire word or simply a group of letters that helps show another word's grammatical category, tense, number, etc. </u>The definition may be strange, but it is easily understood with an example:
- I watch TV yesterday.
<u>Is the sentence above grammatically correct? No.</u> And that is <u>because</u> the word "yesterday" indicates that the action expressed by the verb happened in the past, but <u>the verb itself is missing the grammatical morpheme that indicates the past tense</u>. In this case, since "watch" is a regular verb, the morpheme that is missing is -ed:
- I watched TV yesterday.
Answer:
I don't see any context for this question?