Answer:
B, Italy
Explanation:
In Italy, 60 percent of the shares of a public company are owned by the 3 largest shareholders. This invariably means that the decision making of public companies are mostly at the mercy of just 3 persons as against larger numbers in other countries.
Cheers
Answer:
Net present value at 8%=($42510)
Explanation:
Explanation- Net present value = Present value of cash inflows – Total outflows
={(19000*6.7100) - $170000}
=$127490- $170000
= ($42510)
Annual net cash inflows = Net income+ Depreciation
= $4000+$15000
= $19000
Straight line Method:-
= Cost of asset- Salvage value of asset/No. of useful life (years)
=($170000-$20000)/10 years
=$150000/10 years = $15000
Net present value at 3%=($7926)
Explanation- Net present value = Present value of cash inflows – Total outflows
={(19000*8.5302) - $170000}
=$162074- $170000
= ($7926)
Annual net cash inflows = Net income+ Depreciation
= $4000+$15000
= $19000
Straight line Method:-
= Cost of asset- Salvage value of asset/No. of useful life (years)
=($170000-$20000)/10 years
=$150000/10 years = $15000
Answer:
$15,699.54
Explanation:
The computation of the account balance after 10 years from today is shown below:
= Future value of amount deposited today × (1 + interest rate)^number of years + Future value of amount deposited two years × (1 + interest rate)^number of years + Future value of amount deposited three years × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
= $1,300 × (1 + 8.1%)^10 + $3,200 × (1 + 8.1%)^8 + $4,000 × (1 + 8.1%)^7
= $2,832.70 + $5,966.99 + $6,899.85
= $15,699.54
Answer:
Value of call option = 3.92
Explanation:
Stock price - Exercise price, 0
When share price is $57,
Payoff = Max (57 - 70, 0)
Payoff = Max (-13, 0)
Payoff = 0
When share price is $78
Payoff = Max (78 - 70, 0)
Payoff = Max (8, 0)
Payoff = 8
Value of call option = (Expected payoff * Probaliltiy) / (1 + Interest for the period)
Considering probability as 50% for each stock
Value of call option = (0 * 0.5 + 8 * 0.5) / (1 + 0.02)
Value of call option = 3.92
Answer:
<em>2.statute.</em>
Explanation:
<em>The court ruling will be decided by the contractual agreement signed by the three parties. A Limited Liability Agreement will usually be demonstrated by three parties signing a contract together. </em>
The situation will become difficult once, within each partner, there is no written statement about the distribution of profit. Every partner must obtain the suitable yield rate, based on their original investment.
The verdict begins to appear as if it falls into the hands of the state. By considering the Revised Uniform Partnership Act-Section 306. It relies heavily on where the business is registered, authorized, type of business.
However, John is the majority shareholder with 60 per cent of financial and legal accountability[ which is why he owes more to investment return]. It is also partly due to unlawful double tax laws and they are intended to protect the owner / partner of the business.
The confusion could've been avoided if an attorney and bookkeeper were available to describe the process, before the agreement was made and/or written. The condition they submit for incorporation makes a huge difference however, it does not seem to be the circumstance.
