Answer: a) Fuel Connector's place of business.
Explanation:
Since Go-Flo is expected to pick up the goods from Fuel Connector Products, Inc., therefore, Go-Flo should pick up the the hose couplings and fittings from Fuel Connector's office. Also, since the contract does not specify a place so its only logical that Go-Flo would have to go to Fuel Connector's place of business.
Answer: $80 million per year for 25 years
Explanation:
The option you should choose is one that will guarantee you the highest present value.
This means that you need to discount the annual payment of $80 million per year for 25 years to find the present value. As you did not include a rate, we shall assume a rate of 8% for reference purposes.
The annual payment is an annuity so the present value can be calculated by:
Present value of annuity = Annuity payment * Present value interest factor, rate, no. of years
= 80,000,000 * Present value interest factor, 8%, 25 years
= 80,000,000 * 10.6748
= $853,984,000
<em>The present value of the annual payment is more than the present value of the $850 million received today so the Annual payment should be taken. </em>
6000 to 14000 dollars is the amount that te should both expect to be the transaction cost of selling their home.
<h3>What is the cost of selling a home?</h3>
Several costs usually arises due to the fact that a person wants to sell the home that they own.
One of the costs is the commission fees that these sellers usually pay. The commission fees is usually 5 to 6 percent of the cost of sale.
Read more on commission fees here:
brainly.com/question/24951536
Answer:
b. $ 240,000
Explanation:
Calculation for what Kat should recognize as compensation expenses
Using this formula
Compensation expenses= (Purchase shares ×Value of options)/ Years of Service
Let plug in the formula
Compensation expenses=(60,000 shares
x $8 per option) / 2 years of service
Compensation expenses=480,00/2 years of service
Compensation expenses= = 240,000
Therefore what Kat should recognize as compensation expenses is 240,000
The statement in this question is true.
Answer: Option A.
<u>Explanation:</u>
With the collapse in the real estate markets, in the collapse of the stock markets or the illiquidity of the securities in the United States of America, the demand for the treasury bonds of the country increased because people wanted to have some kind of investment and security in their hands.
But with the increase in the demand of these bonds of the country, there led to an increase in the price of the bond because the demand was more and the supply was less of these bonds. As a result of this the yield to be recovered from these bonds reduced.
