If we are to match the terms of the following logical fallacies with its definition, it would be:
A) The use of popular mass appeal to convince others that they should do/believe something because everyone else does/is
Bandwagon
B) The use of an extreme example that is highly unlikely to try to discredit the action or words of another
Strawman
C) The use of finger-pointing or name-calling to attack the person making the argument instead of the argument itself
Ad Hominem
D) The use of an argument's conclusion as a premise for proving the argument (assuming what it is attempting to prove)
Circular reasoning
E) A conclusion or reply that does not follow the previous statement in a logical manner
Non sequitur
F) The use of quick judgment that is not based on facts but instead on a very limited experience to what one is judging
Hasty generalization
<h3>What is Hasty Generalization?</h3>
This refers to the type of fallacy that is used when a person rushes into a hasty conclusion about a thing from incomplete facts, which is usually incorrect.
Hence, we can see that the correct matchings has been made above.
Read more about hasty generalization here:
brainly.com/question/2955537
#SPJ1
Many folks who make use of child care expect the provider to provide ample opportunities for physical, intellectual, emotional, and social growth, as well as the opportunites to learn skills and explore environments in a mostly-safe manner. A child care provider cannot make available appropriate opportunities and environments if they are unaware of how the children in their care develop. Environments and expectations appropriate to a child in one stage of development can be completely inappropriate for a child in another stage of development.
Explanation:
I was helping a kid through bullying and there was these girls who where always looking at me when I was talking to him and when we told the teacher about the bullying the girls said I was helping the kid through bullying
