Bulgaria is the answer you're looking for.
A strict constructionist is a person who believes that the u.s. constitution should not be amended by judges and that judges should adhere closely to the document's text.
A strict constructionist is the one who believes that the wording of the Constitution is incomprehensible and that the words of the Constitution should be interpreted literally. This philosophy is usually associated with federal jurisdiction when it involves constitutional issues. A strict constructionist usually specifies to a judge who interprets the constitution exactly as it is written. Anyone can be a strict constructionist, but the term best applies to those with political power.
Know more about a strict constructionist here
brainly.com/question/13594866
#SPJ4
They were both territories. Hope that helps
<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, the students should be able to criticize their school in the school newspaper to an agreeable extent.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- To allow the students to bring into practice the education that they are given about the Constitution and the rights granted by the Constitution, they should be given the opportunity to exercise their rights at the school level itself.
- These rights should also include the right to free speech. The students should be allowed to freely put up their thoughts about the school's functioning and its management.
- At the same time, students should not be allowed to speak about the mandatory things done by the management for the good of the students.