I believe the answer is: Pontiac
At that time, Native American tribes were banned from occupying The Great lakes region by the british empire.
Even though not many historians acknowledge this, In 1763, he led a group of revolutionaries to eliminate British influence in this region, which later know as the Battle of the Bloody Run.
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Sensitive issues refer to topics which people tend to feel uncomfortable talking about (Like harassment, addictions, violence)
Many studies on this topic have shown that when people are in front of other person who's interviewing them they might hide some aspects of themselves to create a better impression on the interviewer, therefore, the information acquired this way is not 100% right.
Regarding <u>sensitive issues, it is even more difficult for people to talk about them specially when it comes to an stranger</u> (like a researcher). Thus, it is not recommended to address sensitive issues in interviews but rather by <u>self-administered questionnaires in which the person doesn't have to interact with another person.</u>
<u />
When it comes to complicated issues, a questionnaire is not recommended since it could leave the researcher without enough information, and since it's <u>a complicated issue, the researcher might want to be there to clarify people's answers.</u> Therefore, <u>for complicated issues, it is better to use interviews.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is b) Use self-administered questionnaires for sensitive issues and interviews for complicated issues
The answer is "Referent Power".
Referent power alludes to the capacity of a guide or leader
to impact a supporter in light of the devotee's faithfulness, regard, kinship,
adoration, fondness, or a want to gain approval.
John French and Bertram Raven were two
individuals who presented five kinds of power which are:
Coercive Power.
Reward Power.
Legitimate Power.
Referent Power.
Expert Power.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
<span>You should start by unloading the firearm and opening the action to ensure your safety during the procedure. Next put on your safety harness and check that it is secure. Attach the haul line to your firearm and ensure it is secure. Next, slip the end of the haul line through your belt and secure firmly.
You are now ready to mount the tree stand.</span>
