The answer is the second option: T<span>wo places left.
Therefore, the complete text is: "</span>To obtain the number of centimeters from a distance measured in meters, move the decimal point Two places left ".
<span>
The explanation is:
1 meter has 100 centimeters, then, if you have a distance of 45.55 centimeters and you want to know this value in meters, you need to divide it by 100 or, in others words, you need to </span>move the decimal point two places left:
<span>
=(45.55 centimeters)(1 meter/100 centimeters)
=(45.55x1)/100
=0.4555 meters
</span>
<em>Look</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>attached</em><em> </em><em>picture</em><em>⤴</em>
<em>Hope</em><em> </em><em>this</em><em> </em><em>will</em><em> </em><em>help</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>.</em><em>:</em><em>)</em>
A(b+c)=ab+ac
we have
9(72)=9*?+9*2
c=2
sub, but it must be equal to minus 2 from 72
7(70+2)=9*70+9*2
the question mark is 70
and the restult of the equation is 648
?=70
Answer:
39 ft 6 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The correct option are;
1) Could not
2) Is
Step-by-step explanation:
The parameters given are;
The survival rate of drivers using seat-belt = 67%
The survival rate of drivers not using seat-belt = 41.5%
The chance of getting the survival rate results without a correlation with the use of seat-belt < 0.0001
Given that the chance of obtaining the given survival rates without the seat-belt having an effect on survival rate is less than 0.01 percent we have;
The probability shows that the sample results <u>could not</u> have occurred by chance. It appears that there <u>is</u> sufficient evidence to conclude that seat-belts do have an effect on survival rate.
