I can’t see the table. Include an attachment?
Answer:
454
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The table can be computed as:
Advertising Expenses ($ million) Number of companies
25 up to 35 4
35 up to 45 19
45 up to 55 27
55 up to 65 16
65 up to 75 9
TOTAL 75
Let's find the probabilities first:
For 35 up to 45
For 45 up to 55
For 55 up to 65
For 65 up to 75
Chi-Square Table can be computed as follows:
Expense No of Probabilities(P) Expe
compa cted E (n*p)
nies (O)
25-35 4 0.0612 75*0.0612 = 4.59 0.3481 0.0758
35-45 19 0.2218 75*0.2218 = 16.635 5.5932 0.3362
45-55 27 0.3568 75*0.3568 = 26.76 0.0576 0.021
55-65 16 0.2552 75*0.2552 = 19.14 9.8596 0.5151
65-75 9 0.0839 75*0.0839 = 6.2925 7.331 1.1650
Using the Chi-square formula:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Assume that:
degree of freedom:
= n-1
= 5 -1
= 4
Critical value from
Decision rule: To reject
test statistics is greater than
tabulated.
Conclusion: Since
is less than critical value 11.667. Then we fail to reject
5x>/ 45
at least means it can be 45 and up
So it becomes greater than or equal to
Answer:
-4, -6, -3, -5, -1. The inequality solved for n is n ≥ -6.
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute all the values in the equation.
n/2 ≥ -3
-10/2 ≥ -3
-5 is not ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-7/2 ≥ -3
-3.5 is not ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-4/2 ≥ -3
-2 is ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-9/2 ≥ -3
-4.5 is not ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-6/2 ≥ -3
-3 is ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-3/2 ≥ -3
-1.5 is ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-8/2 ≥ -3
-4 is not ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-5/2 ≥ -3
-2.5 is ≥ -3.
n/2 ≥ -3
-2/2 ≥ -3
-1 is ≥ -3.
To solve the inequality n/2 ≥ -3 for n, do these steps.
n/2 ≥ -3
Multiply by 2.
n ≥ -6.