Answer:
I
Explanation:
I am a European immigrant that came to the United States of America I came to America because they got so much stuff and I heard from my fellow friends that it's the best place to be I'm sorry to leave you and work has been caught me up but I've settled down really nasty and a nice little town here in America I wish all you can come so you can see this amazing side of this new country even though we Europeans had bad impressions of it it's actually not that bad...
Answer:
At Valley Forge, there were shortages of everything from food to clothing to medicine. Washington's men were sick from disease, hunger, and exposure. The Continental Army camped in crude log cabins and endured cold conditions while the Redcoats warmed themselves in colonial homes.
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Persians didn't have cannons
Arrows would have been blocked with the shields
cavalry would have been blocked by a shield formation
The case you describe is: SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere or in a segregated program at the University of Texas failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other options such as those would have lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's main law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
Answer:
Budget surplus
Explanation:
If a government spends less money than it brings in through taxes in one year then that government has a BUDGET SURPLUS.
The opposite version is known as BUDGET DEFICIT whereby the government spends more money than it brings in through taxes in one year.
Therefore, in this case, the correct answer to the question is "Budget surplus."
