All categories

3 years ago

Put the following equation of a line into slope-intercept form, simplifying all

1 answer:

7 0

I believe y=-x+8 cause you would take the 2 then subtract it to the 16 for it to turn into 2y=-2x+16 then you take the 2y and divide

You might be interested in

Suppose that a ball is dropped from the upper observation deck of the CN Tower in Toronto, 450 m above the ground. Find the velo

mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

1350

Step-by-step explanation:

460 X 3

7 0

3 years ago

How many real solutions does x²+8x+20=0 have?

garri49 [273]

Answer:

No real solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the discriminant formula, D = b² - 4ac

D = b² - 4ac

Plug in b, a, and c:

D = b² - 4ac

D = (8)² - 4(1)(20)

D = 64 - 80

D = -16

Since the discriminant is negative, there are no real solutions

7 0

3 years ago

Which could be the value of the third side of a triangle with sides 3 and 4? A. 3 B. 7 C. 12 D. 20

LiRa [457]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

The ratio of sixth graders to seventh graders at the school dance is 2 to 3.

Inessa [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2:3 x 9

18:27

18 + 27 = 45

6 0

3 years ago

Tain has a great literary tradition that spans centuries. One might assume, then, that Britons read more than citizens of other

tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

$z=3.02$

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

The p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

$X_{1}=0.86*1004$ represent the number of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$X_{2}=0.81*1009$ represent the number of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

$n_{1}=1004$ sample of Gallup selected

$n_{2}=1009$ sample of Britons selected

$p_{1}=0.86$ represent the proportion of Canadians randomly sampled by Gallup that read at least one book in the past year

$p_{2}=0.81$ represent the proportion of Britons randomly sampled that read at least one book in the past year

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

2) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion for men with red/green color blindness is a higher than the rate for women , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{1} \leq p_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{1} > p_{2}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{0.81+0.86}{2}=0.835$

3) Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.86-0.81}{\sqrt{0.835(1-0.835)(\frac{1}{1004}+\frac{1}{1009})}}=3.02$

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>3.02)=0.00127$

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05, 0,1,0.15$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of Canadians is not significantly higher than the porportions of readers at Britons.

5 0

3 years ago