A practical benefit of Content curation is that it requires little in the way of resources
Explanation:
Content curation is the skill of assembling analogous, related topic and presenting it in an organized manner. It does not developing original content but collecting the related and relevant content from various resources and specifying in a sequential and well-designed that suits the taste and preferences of the online viewers.
Videos, articles and website which we often book ark are types of content curation which we do without exactly knowing it in depth. Curated content differs drastically from content creation. Curation is gathering selective content to increase the search engine optimization and content creation is developing original content without any aspect of plagiarism in it.
Answer:
The Tea Act of 1773 was one of several measures imposed on the American colonists by the heavily indebted British government in the decade leading up to the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). The act’s main purpose was not to raise revenue from the colonies but to bail out the floundering East India Company, a key actor in the British economy. The British government granted the company a monopoly on the importation and sale of tea in the colonies. The colonists had never accepted the constitutionality of the duty on tea, and the Tea Act rekindled their opposition to it. Their resistance culminated in the Boston Tea Party on December 16, 1773, in which colonists boarded East India Company ships and dumped their loads of tea overboard. Parliament responded with a series of harsh measures intended to stifle colonial resistance to British rule; two years later the war began.
<u>Please Give Me BRAINLIEST!!</u>
<u></u>
<u>Answer:
</u>
The intellectual property right that Elizabeth should be concerned about is that of copyright.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When an author, designer, artist, or a performer gets his/her original work protected with copyright, making copies of the work for free distribution or reselling becomes a crime.
- The copyright protection can be sought for both published or unpublished work. It becomes legally binding for the buyer to pay for every copy of the work officially and legitimately produced.
Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
