Forests would be able to survive a disease better.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Many studies have taken place for many years to determine what type of ecosystem can best survive diseases effectively. A recent study has concluded that the forests are the viable ecosystem which can survive a disease better then any other ecosystem; followed by grasslands as the second best.
The study states that the chances of forests are better as the ecosystem contains many different species of trees and plants. The mix of several species in an ecosystem helps in surviving climate changes, pests and severe diseases. According to the study, the diversity of different biological species have a better rate of production than an environment which has only one species in it. The biodiversity will help produce the amount of energy that would best suit the needs of population.
New data about evolutionary relationship between organisms
Explanation:
New data about the evolutionary relationship between organisms most likely dictated that the domain level is adopted.
- Evolutionary trends and morphological relationship between organisms became very important in the classification system.
Organisms are classified into the domain levels as:
- Archaea,
- Bacteria,
- Eukarya
This classification is based on the sequences of nucleotides in the cell.
Learn more:
Domain brainly.com/question/7172507
#learnwithBrainly
"different ears"
According to <span>Broadbent's study, depending on which ear the stimulus was done, one of the channels were used. If both ears were used then there was a channel-swapping phenomenon that proved his theory of auditory attentional selection.</span>
Difference:
The biological process of sexual reproduction requires the input of genetic material from many people. When a flower self-pollinates, for example, the term "individual" might refer to gamete cells developing as a single physical or even genetic organism. I don't want to substitute the word "cell" for "person," either, as that would eliminate instances of acellular biologic entities that reproduce, like viruses. When a piece of a chromosome from one bacterium is injected into another, it recombines and reproduces there, with or without sporulation, which is one instance of what I consider sexual reproduction but which not all viewers would. My notion just requires some genetic material, even in the form of an episome, not gametes. Asexual phases are included in nearly all forms of reproduction, but I regard all of them to be a part of sexual reproduction when they take place throughout a life cycle that also contains an obligatory sexual phase. Brewer's yeast serves as an illustration of the distinction I make because either the diploid or haploid stage, which could be classified as a gametophyte or sporophyte, can be maintained through an infinite number of mitoses. As a result, I consider vegetative propagation to be asexual reproduction.
Now that you have the difference compare the similarties.
