American modernism was a dominant trend between World War I and World War II.
American modernist authors explored the form and language of poetry through topics such as race relations, gender and the human condition.
John Steinbeck is representative of American modernism mainly because he wrote novels containing social and economical issues.
Answer:
Probably, the creature see himself as a sinner, like the entire creation, but at the same time, he feels that there's still hope on the rendemption. But also, he sees himself as a creature that can be make several things, suffer, and still found hope in life.
Explanation:
Let's understand better. The question asks strictly about Paradise Lost, but I think we must analyze the creature's reaction based on the reading of the previous books - Lives and Sorrows of Werter. Well, the first one - Lives - is a biography selection of important Roman and Greek generals and politicians, and give us a feeling of importance, of inspiration to be better. However, when the creature reads Goethe, he feels depressed, just like Werther who cannot consume his love. Even so, the inspirations influenced by Lives are still there, and the creature continues his readings a bit better. But Paradise Lost, and the story of how Lucifer fall in disgrace, and the subsequent creation of the sin, the creature look at himself and think that as a mortal being, he can be great (like the personalities in Lives), he can suffer and almost give up like Werther, but he finds hope like humanity with the coming of Christ.
Answer:
If this is the pearl, it's Juana. Kino was selfish to want to keep the pearl after all the trouble it's caused
Hope this helps :)
Explanation:
to show that enslavement is contradictory to the practice of Christianity and to American values
No Compromise With Slavery,” William Lloyd Garrison exposes that freedom and slavery contradict each other. Throughout the text, Garrison uses his passion for abolishing slavery to convince the readers that slavery is amoral and the work of the devil.
The answer is B: arrogant.
Someone who is arrogant will show a tendency to exaggerate one´s own worth or importance in a way that is unwelcoming, invasive, or frankly exasperating. The three ways that the question addresses someone who is arrogant clearly describe this kind of character. First, a pompous person would be one that grants him or herself more importance than perhaps befits that person. Second, an aloof character would be one that is distanced; in this case it would be one that is distanced from reality, in the sense that that person is too distanced of him or herself to be a good judge of his or her own character´s worth. Finally, domineering would be a kind of character that exercises arbitrary control over others; in this case, it would be the kind of control that an arrogant person would arbitrarily exercise over others based on his or her own self-worth, which is, as it can be seen above, not justified.
