On page 406 of the text, read the case entitled Coker v. Pershad. The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey rea
sons that AAA had no control over the independent contractor's work and thus Pershad was an employee of Five Star, but Five Star (and by extension, Pershad) were independent contractors to AAA. This type of arrangement is not uncommon. Neither are situations where trucking companies (among others) employ individuals who are designated as independent contractors but are trained by the company and have a manual of regulations provided to them which, in essence, controls where they drive, how they drive, how long are the drivers' work breaks, and who can ride in the cab of the truck. Additionally, drivers often wear a company uniform. The artifice of calling someone an independent contractor when the driver actually is not, is no more than an effort to avoid liability for the person's actions on the job and certain regulatory (unemployment insurance; workers compensation, etc.) and tax considerations. Consequently, the situations must be carefully examined on a case-by-case basis to discern the actual status of the individual. Do you agree with the courts reasoning? Why?
Yeah, We agree with the North Carolina Court the decision that 5 Stars was an independent consultant. AAA does hire and fir five Stars staff, who may not evaluate all staff to see if their company is fit. they will not. AAA employed 5 Star in the name of the rental agency and was not responsible for its and other businesses. It is an employer, that is a consultant regardless of who determines to work. Decided to hire that work or even the independent contractor the company that had hired an independent contractor. We employ people as they already have the training to do a work, which the organization has completed, this is like recruiting an employment agency. I don't think companies avoid liability.
first example is it can have an emotional toll on an individual and cause them to go into depression.
second example is if the victim has to testify that can bring back the memory and will re open them to the trauma they suffered and they can become ashamed and think that everyone doesn't look at them the same way which makes them feel even worse about them selves until they can't stand to be around people anymore.
It would be a violation of the due process and the equal protection under the law.
Explanation:
The fourteenth amendement is based on the conventional interpretation that "justice is blind" and that it should be administered without the implications of race, gender, religious beliefs or ethnicity.
