Explanation:
A substance that contains of amino acid and are present in all living organism
Does that help??
Sorry if not
In Palko v. Connecticut (1937), the Supreme Court had to decide whether "due process of law" means states must obey the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The observation of the Supreme Court is that the convict cannot be punished two times for the same offense. It is simple and very clear that the convict cannot be punished under the fourth and fifth amendments for same offense.
In this particular case, the prosecution has charged Frank Palko for first-degree murder and the court has given a decree as life imprisonment. But the actual nature crime amounts to second-degree murder.
So, the state of Connecticut appealed against this judgment and it has been proved that offense made by Frank Palko amounts to second-degree murder and the death penalty is awarded to convict. The Supreme Court's main decision in Palko vs Connecticut was Palko was the victim of unconstitutional double jeopardy.
Two examples of real-life instances where a person might engage in an error in reasoning and, as a result, come to a faulty conclusion about something that they observed are:
1. Concluding that a person is harsh because his face is not cheerful.
2. Predicting that it will rain because the weather is gloomy.
<h3>What is a Faulty Conclusion?</h3>
A faulty conclusion is reached when the pattern of reasoning is faulty. Before a conclusion can be reached on a matter, it is vital to test the observations beyond all reasonable doubts.
If this is not done, the probability of reaching a faulty conclusion will be high.
Learn more about faulty conclusions here:
brainly.com/question/2141635
