Answer:
<h3>c. Punitive damages.</h3>
Explanation:
Through the allocation of Punitive damages, it provides the distressed plaintiff the right to punish and deter the defendant from engaging in the same offense in the future.
Those who support punitive damages contends that such provisions would help the society from witnessing similar offences from the same person or an organisation in the future. In simple terms, punitive damages are like deterrence that will keep a check on the offender from making the same offence in the future.
It is a retributive action that tries to sends a message that offenders will be prosecuted with heavy penalty and consequences.
Accurate identification of the person responsible, is noble because it means that the judge looks at all evidence and makes an unbiased decision based on evidence solely .
Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation , and restoration are more noble because it keeps formal criminals from going back into crime and makes the country safer.
Answers may differ :)
This is a great question with various for and against points so i shall just give you a few that come to mind.
FOR
-conditions can be below to basic living standards, which is immoral and a violation of human rights
-People wouldn't voluntarily pay money to maintain the living conditions of convicts due to the atrocities of their crime.
-Statistics support the fact 'it doesn't work' as rehabilitation is in the minority
-it does not reduce crime rate in the slightest
-corruption
AGAINST
-what is the question suggesting should happen to convicts instead?
-wrongfully convicted
apologies im running out of time, so i can write appropriate against. hope this helps though
Answer:
B: Wayned a high school dropout
Hope this help
