Answer:
of good title.
Explanation:
A good can be defined as any physical object or material that typically satisfy and meets the demands, needs or wants of customers. Some examples of a good are mobile phones, television, microphone, microwave oven, bread, pencil, freezer, beverages, soft drinks, etc.
A warranty can be defined as a written promise or guarantee made by a manufacturer, lessor or seller about the identity or quality of goods and services or a property to a purchaser, promising him or her to repair or replace it if necessary within a specified time frame.
Hence, a warranty in which the seller of a good or service warrants that he or she has valid title to the goods he or she is selling and that the transfer of title is rightful is known as a warranty of good title.
A legal title can be defined as the actual (absolute) ownership of a property that is recognized and enforceable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Answer:
$60,500
Explanation:
The cost of the land to be recorded consist of the cost of the land itself and other associated cost with the purchase.
The amount realized as income in the process is deducted from the cost.
Cost of land
= $50,000 + $5,000 + $4,000 + $2,000 - $500
= $60,500
Answer:
<em>(D) among them the threat of a rival’s multibillion-dollar patent-infringement suit and the decline in sales of</em>
Explanation:
Simplified Meaning is: Several issues were heard by investors at the annual SHM.
Two problems were among those: a threat from the MDPI of a competitor and a decline in the sales of the strong microprocessor chip of the company.
Verbing modifier should amend the preceding clause and make much sense in relation to the preceding clause.
Modifies the problems here with the other options and does not suit well with the subjective "investors".
Hello there!
Let's take note of some things first. When a argument occurs, there's always two different kind of people. You would have someone who think he has a point and he explains his opinion on this matter, and then you would have the other opponent who would most likely say the complete opposite of this other person.
Now, when conduction the argument of the topic "cell phones", there would be a ton of different opinions on this matter.
For an example:
(Person #1) - opposer.
Cell Phone's are very useful, when you need to call a person, you would have something to communicate with the other person. It would be encounter as a essential in our every day life.
(Person #2) - opposer.
I believe that Cell Phones are unsafe. People could track you down and hurt you to the full. They can take your information, and then you would have some several bad cases on this matter. I believe that Cell Phones are not safe.
__________
Based on looking at this example here, you would see on how they're are two different opinions here. They both have different explanations.
I hope this helps you!
A business that does not need a full-time accountant, would most likely use a public accountant in which services are exchanged for a fee.
<h3>Who is an accountant?</h3>
An accountant is a professional who is responsible for analyzing and interpreting financial records of an organization. He also keeps the financial records of business or firm that employs him.
The role of an accountant include performing accounting functions such as:
- Analyzing accounts
- Auditing
- Reporting the financial transactions of a person or a business.
Learn more about accountants here: brainly.com/question/13433103
#SPJ1